LONG
AFTER THE THRILL
by
Les Phillips
Something's Gotta Give was written and directed
by Nancy Meyers, but you can bet your bottom dollar that it was rewritten
and reprogrammed by a committee of marketing executives. It has a holiday
season niche: romantic comedy with older stars. It has another marketing
hook: girl directs feminist comeback movie for older feminist movie
star. Only a committee of old men who smoke cigars, or young men (or
women) who want to be old men who smoke cigars, would interpret feminism
as "throw over Keanu Reeves for Jack Nicholson." Especially when Keanu,
to my knowledge for the very first time, plays a man -- a mature, independent,
self-sufficient, emotionally together man. And Jack Nicholson, as he
often does, plays a child.
I
have to admit that Jack has some wonderful comic moments here, amidst
all the Jackery and japery, and some nice dramatic moments as well.
Half an hour into the film, Diane Keaton is so disgusted with Jack Nicholson
that she wants him out of the house, out of her life, out of the movie.
This is, of course, exactly what she should have done; we could all
have gone home ninety minutes early and celebrated the end of Jack Nicholson's
career, and Diane Keaton could have gone to bed with Keanu Reeves. But,
no, Jack grew on her, and damned if he didn't grow on me too. And so
then Jack and Diane have their little fling, They Have Sex, and it changes
their lives, but they decide it won't really work, and they go their
separate ways. That would have made a nice movie. Except it goes on
for another thirty minutes, and drags you through the damnedest set
of false endings and clumsy plot constructions to put Jack and Diane
together again. That ending apparently tested better, even though getting
there made no sense at all.
Still, there are lots of reasons to see Something's
Gotta Give. It looks gorgeous. It takes place in New York and Paris,
and the film
was actually shot in New York and Paris. Everyone in the film is very
rich. They all have many possessions for you to envy, and they have
really good dinners at expensive yet cozy-looking restaurants. Frances
McDormand plays Keaton's sister, and she steals every scene she is in.
I wouldn't mind if McDormand developed a sideline as the wiseass sister/neighbor/best
friend of the female lead in retro romantic comedies. A girl has to
eat, and it'd give her more maneuvering room within the industry, so
that she could make other, riskier films.
The
major reason to see this film is unquestionably Diane Keaton. The cliché
is well-founded: she's not afraid to look her age. She can also look
ten years older or younger, depending on what's called for at a given
moment. Her delight in sex is thoroughly convincing; her sad moments
are deeply, even profoundly touching; she makes a crying breakdown heartfelt,
then silly and heartfelt at the same time; and more than a bit of Annie
Hall is still visible. The character is written without real dimensions,
but Keaton herself has dimensions to spare; she fills out the part nicely.
Another of the best performances of the year.
*
We
start with your basic dwarf (Peter Dinklage); a reclusive, grumpy dwarf
whose only apparent connection in life comes through a preoccupation
with trains and railways. He works in a store in Hoboken that sells
and repairs all kinds of model trains. He goes to meetings of train
enthusiasts and watches films of trains rolling down the rails, going
into tunnels, coming out of tunnels. When his employer dies, he inherits
an abandoned train depot in rural New Jersey, and goes to live there.
He walks there, on train tracks. No phone or electricity in this depot,
a bit of shabby furniture, a lot of train stuff. Now comes a depressed
woman (Patricia Clarkson), a painter, estranged from her husband, also
solitary, but in a nicer house. She and the dwarf "meet cute" (she nearly
runs him over with her car). Very gradually, they befriend each other.
Then comes a friendly, jockish owner of a concessions truck (Bobby Cannavale),
who drives out to rural New Jersey from Manhattan every day to sell
cafe con leche and hot dogs to absolutely nobody. He parks his truck
in front of the abandoned depot. He keeps inviting the dwarf out for
drinks, for parties, for a good time.
At
this point, I decided The Station Agent was surreal. Hot
young Hispanic dudes do not drive hot dog trucks from Manhattan out
to the Delaware Water Gap to park them in random locations with no customers
and sell cafe con leche, dwarf or no dwarf. Yet The Station Agent
is not supposed to be surreal. It's supposed to be real, or at least
"real," and, despite its many true and beautiful moments, I simply had
trouble getting around its fundamental implausibility. If a filmmaker
wants to point to the heart of human nature by heightening eccentricity,
you gotta believe the eccentricities -- and for me, that wasn't possible.
The
acting is lovely. I read somewhere that writer/director Thomas McCarthy
wanted to make a film with these three particular actors. It's nice
to start with a sort of dream, with images and ideas, and to believe
that the actors will fill in the spaces between the moods and images,
but that often doesn't work, and it doesn't work here. The Station
Agent avoids cliché. It is not quite the film where goodness
turns out to be the province of the ignored and dispossessed (even dwarves
started small, etc.), not a film about Beautiful Losers, not a film
where true love and friendship saves people, not a film where people
get what they want in the end after struggle and suffering, not a fount
of political rectitude.
Having
achieved those negative virtues, a film like The Station Agent
still has to be something unto itself, besides just weird. It doesn't
quite succeed. This is partly because, in an effort not to make the
characters too likable, they're not made likable enough. I think the
dwarf is terminally grouchy and really does want to be alone, and good
for him, best wishes; I think the estranged wife wants to be miserable;
and I think the hot dog salesman is a basically happy guy who has wandered
into the wrong film, or been foisted there. The film looks beautiful,
if seriously underpopulated. The virtues of loneliness are well portrayed.
Did I mention that the acting was lovely? It's not enough.
©2003 Les Phillips
CineScene