![]() |
|
|
War of the Worlds
Ray Ferrier is a divorced dockworker and a poor father. His ex-wife, Mary Ann, has custody of his two children and has since remarried. But today, she is dropping off their children, teenage son Robbie and younger daughter Rachel, for the weekend while she and her new husband head to Boston to visit her parents. Hard working, but self centered, Ray is ill equipped to handle the kids. And after a half-hearted attempt that alienates Robbie, Ray retreats to his bedroom to find solace in an afternoon nap. When he awakens, Robbie is gone, along with his car. And equally disturbing, a rare and powerful lightning storm arrives. Unlike anything ever witnessed, the storm features lightning capable of striking in the same place. And when it subsides, Ray ventures out in search of Robbie. Along the way, he notices a lack of electricity throughout the neighborhood. And soon, he bumps into Robbie, who is on his way home after his vehicle just stalled. Ray sends Robbie home while he Over the years, War of the Worlds has undergone many incarnations from radio to television to feature length films. First published in 1898, H.G. Wells’ simplistic story of an insurmountable alien invasion played upon a society’s fear of the unknown universe, and has since become a literary classic for well over a century. But its legendary status erupted on October 30, 1938, when a radio broadcast of the novel created widespread panic. Narrated by Orson Welles, the radio play was broadcast in the format of a news bulletin, reporting that a fiery object had landed near a farm in Grovers Mill, N.J., and that the earth was under attack. With the nation already on the edge over the outset of World War II, the frightening tale was misconstrued by thousands of people as a real event. Then, in 1953, the story re-emerged, this time as a feature length film with Gene Barry and Ann Robinson. Under the helm of special effects wizard George Pal, this new interpretation shifted the setting to Southern California. And once again, it heightened anxiety during the era of McCarthyism. Now, over a century later, in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on American soil, H.G. Wells’ story returns with a familiar, yet haunting image. Without question, Steven Spielberg’s War of the Worlds is a dazzling and horrific spectacle to behold. Calling upon the talents of cinematographer Janusz Kaminski, the film utilizes a variety of “This is not a war. This is an extermination!” Appropriate words used by Ogilvy to describe the massive assault on Earth. It’s an incomprehensible event and rather than cover it all, the film wisely narrows its scope to first person. Yet, this decision is not without flaw. Portrayed as an egotistical, selfish buffoon, Ray Ferrier is an unattractive focal character. And his motivations throughout the film are driven by a lack of fatherly skills. In other words, he is not so much trying to save and protect his children as he is trying to find their mother so that he can abandon them once again. This, of course, makes it very difficult to believe any kind of transformation is real. After all, it’s almost amusing to think that the only way he becomes a loving father is through a global holocaust. In the lead role, Tom Cruise is adequate, even sharing a tender moment and a tearful lullaby with his daughter. And Dakota Fanning shows signs of maturity. But for the most part, this is simply another action film with flat characters and singular emotions, one in which its participants are placed into situations where their only recourse is to run or scream. Digging deeper, an even bigger problem with War of the Worlds is that it supplies very little logic behind the action on the screen. By nature, action films have that tendency. But this is Steven Spielberg we’re talking about, whose suspenseful thrillers include Jaws, Indiana Jones, and Jurassic Park, films where the action escalates only as a result of real character building. But that doesn’t happen with these one-dimensional characters. And in a science fiction genre where fantasy is based on plausible science, the lines are crossed even more. Aliens have been planning hostility against Earth for millions of years, possibly predating man’s very own existence. And questions begin popping up like: How can a collective be hostile against another that doesn’t exist? How could such an advanced civilization overlook something as simple as bacteria? And how could they not have evolved from tripods? Equally puzzling, the film fails to explain the widespread growth of the red weed, the loss of power in some areas and not others, the disintegration of people but not their clothes, the origin of aliens via lightning bolts, and numerous other scientific quandaries. Thus, with so much unanswered, the trust factor between the filmmaker and the audience is severed. And it only draws attention to other circumstantial flaws. The family has the only operational car in the state of New Jersey. And Like many of Steven Spielberg’s works, War of the Worlds is a highly entertaining visual extravaganza. And it is bound to be one of the summer’s smash successes with its electrifying action and earth shattering effects. But if you put the fancy stuff aside, you are left with a film that asks too many questions and provides too few answers. It’s a courageous leap of faith that Spielberg asks of his audience - one that crosses the boundaries of fortuitous circumstance and theoretical science to emerge, poorly conceived. And while many of the details are faithful to the novel, very little is left to the imagination. Says the narrator: “By the toll of a billion deaths, man has bought his birthright of the earth…For neither do men live nor die in vain.” And birthright or no, you’ll be hard pressed to find a trace of humanity in this war of the worlds. ©2005 Mark Sells |