Although
he is practically unknown in the States, Dariush Mehrjui is the grand
old man of Iranian cinema - making challenging, relevant films since
the 60s. LEILA, his latest work, shows an engagement with issues
of women's lives that is surprisingly adult. The state-imposed strictures
on content have produced a glut of Iranian films about children, a
state of things that can only continue so long before artistic stagnation
sets in. Mehrjui has resisted this trend, and it's no surprise that
his films have been suppressed more than once. Leila is a powerful
breakthrough, a great film about the oppression of women, both external
and internal.
The beautiful Leila (Leila Hatami) is apparently the perfect match
for the handsome and wealthy Reza (Ali Mosaffa). They adore each other
and share a relaxed, playful friendship as well. But after they are
married, it is discovered that Leila cannot have children. She is
ashamed and grief-stricken. Reza insists that he doesn't care. He
only wants her for herself. Yet he is an only child, and his mother,
concerned lest he not carry on the family name, asks Leila to agree
to a divorce. When it becomes clear that Leila won't agree to that,
Reza's mother asks her to assent to his taking a second wife. Torn
by a sense of failure, and sensing that her husband really wants a
child despite his protests, she agrees to the proposal. From there
things proceed inexorably - Leila's instinct for self-punishment combining
with Reza's mixed signals to create an ever deepening distress.
By not portraying the husband as a pig, Mehrjui ensures that the
drama is more penetrating. Reza is sincere in his love, and means
it when he says he loves Leila for herself. But he is also unable
to resist the pressures of his mother, who represents a traditional
way of thinking about marriage and family, and his passive acquiescence
actually amounts to complicity. This is the essence of his tragedy.
Leila's story, the film's center, is even more poignant. She has internalized
so much shame about being a woman that she finds it impossible to
resist the social pressures that are exerted on her, yet at the same
time her spirit is too strong and vibrant to merely accept what is
happening.
It is one of the film's beautiful touches that the stress of these
traditional values is expressed through modernity - namely the telephone,
of which the constant ringing signals another intrusion by the mother
or other meddling relatives. I found myself saying, "Don't pick up
the phone!" but of course Leila and Reza can't avoid their family,
their environment, their culture, and one of them must pick up the
phone.
Hatami is fine in the title role. Mehrjui employs a lot of close-
ups. The silent agony of Leila's face is meant to stand for a lot.
At times he relies on this motif too much. But her face does have
an inward expressiveness that comes across very strongly.
The film maintains a steady, determined pace, Mehrjui carefully detailing
each stage of the path with heartbreaking precision. His interest
is not in making some didactic point, but in depicting the gradual
development of a destructive process in a marriage. The director has
taken the time to really let us know these people, the way they think
and talk, and also the things they don't say. The couple, their parents
and siblings and friends, the city of Tehran itself with its mixture
of ancient and modern, are all portrayed so carefully that each turn
in the story makes absolute sense, right up to the remarkable, utterly
convincing end.
THE
TERRORIST is about another woman in extremis. This time the story
is more sensational, the style less subtle. But the film has its own
special rewards.
The story takes place in India, during some brutal, unspecified regional
conflict. Malli (Ayesha Dharkar) is a 19-year-old girl who has seen
her family killed by government soldiers. She is part of a guerrilla
army, a fanatic in the cause. With an iron determination to help her
people, and nothing left to lose, she volunteers for the ultimate
mission. She is to assassinate a prominent politician in a suicide
bombing.
The movie, directed by Santosh Sivan, is a harrowing journey of decision.
We follow her as she is led through the jungle by a young boy to a
rendezvous with a ship, and later to her revolutionary contacts who
will train her in the mission. All the while, flashbacks detail the
terrible losses that have led her this far. Then, as Malli hides out
on a farm waiting for the time when she will die, the desire to live
- exemplified by her garrulous host, a simple farmer, and some unexpected
events - begins to weaken her resolve. The fillm's tension becomes
extreme in its final third, as the forces of life and death struggle
within her. This is one of those great stories where you really don't
know what's going to happen, and you just have to find out.
Sivan's style can be a bit melodramatic. Music is sometimes employed
too insistently to create mood. The Terrorist is nevertheless
a remarkable picture Sivan is very good at using natural imagery,
especially water, to portray the inner world of his fanatical heroine.
(A veteran cinematographer, he shot the film himself and the visuals
are marvelous.) Dharkar has an unusual face, both strikingly beautiful
and disturbing in its earthiness. There is a lot of extreme close-up,
so that we are made to feel as if projected into this girl's intense
mind.
There is some excess here, but it's in the service of more than a
story. Sivan wants us to experience being on the edge of life and
death, the decision to end life hanging over the action like the shadow
of mortality itself, making the things of this world more vivid and
precious in the brilliance of the moment which will soon expire. He
pulls it off brilliantly. The Terrorist works as a thriller,
and also as a meditation on the deepest conflicts within ourselves.
CineScene, 2000