![]() |
|
Dashiell's Flicks: |
Mutual Appreciation
by Chris Dashiell
His latest one is called Mutual Appreciation. In scenes that follow and balance one another while maintaining a sense of formlessness, we follow Alan (Justin Rice), an amiable young musician and songwriter who has traveled to Brooklyn from Boston to try to make a living playing small rock clubs. (His phone conversations with his father, who quietly insists on him finding a real job, are dead on.) His best friend Lawrence (played by Bujalski himself) is a teaching assistant whose girlfriend Ellie (Rachel Clift) can’t help but flirt a little with Alan. Things happen, kind of: Lawrence is asked to be part of an all-male reading of women’s oral histories, Alan reluctantly hooks up with a local female DJ, which leads to him asking her brother to play drums for him. After a poorly-attended concert, he ends up at a party where he calls his ex-girlfriend, ditches his current one, gets drunk, and then goes to another party where some young women wearing wigs try to get him to put on a dress. All this is a prelude to a triangle with his best friend’s partner. But not really.
Most movies present reality through color, sets, make-up, good-looking actors, and multimillion dollar budgets. Taking all that away doesn’t guarantee that you don’t have a turkey, but Bujalski is a director in tune with his limited means. The black and white photography and absence of a musical score seem inevitable. The characters look, act, and talk like real people, and the dialogue especially—funny, evasive, sometimes quite annoying—is presented in as unemphatic a way as possible. The effect, if you’re used to the way movies usually depict things, is almost bizarre. This is precisely the point, if you must have one. The film takes the complete uncertainty of real life and sticks it right in your face. Through a kind of artistic subtraction, Mutual Appreciation leaves us alone with the humor, and the discomfort, of our self-regard. With satiric zeal, director and native Tucsonan Kirby Dick attacks this questionable institution in his latest movie, appropriately titled This Film Is Not Yet Rated. First with a combination of interviews and clips, he presents the facts. For a filmmaker to get an NC-17 instead of an R is in effect to doom his or her film to failure, since most theaters will steer clear of a film with this rating. Thus directors are forced to take material out of their films because of the opinions of persons whose identities are secret. Furthermore, these evaluators often refuse to give details on what exactly is offensive, so the filmmaker is left groping in the dark trying to figure out what to cut. And what do these mystery judges find so offensive? Sex usually, violence almost never. The sexual desires of women and gays are apparently quite frightening, while straight male desire and abusive treatment of women is ok. Kimberly Peirce, who directed Boys Don’t Cry, tells how her movie was threatened with an NC-17 because a female orgasm went on too long. How long is too long, you may wonder. But no answer is forthcoming. The film’s brash, self-confident style reveals the whole process as the ludicrous bit of hypocrisy that it is. Censorship is a fool’s game, and Dick makes a good case for scrapping the MPAA rating system as a dishonest, incoherent curb on freedom of expression that helps foster crummy films while right-wing opportunists end up using Hollywood as their whipping boy anyway. This Film Is Not Yet Rated is a smart, fun, and engaging documentary.
©2005 Chris Dashiell |