Reviews

Features

Author Index

Other reviews by Howard Schumann

 

Contact Us

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Doom Service
by Howard Schumann

According to Mayan and the Aztec cosmology, there have been four previous worlds and we are now in the Fifth World. Each of the prior worlds was destroyed in a cataclysm, but as one world is destroyed, another is reborn. Alex Proyas’ metaphysical thriller Knowing speculates about such weighty subjects and about whether the universe unfolds randomly according to chance or deterministically according to a preconceived plan. It is an entertaining and ambitious film providing much food for thought, though perhaps it is more audacious than successful.

The film opens fifty years ago at Lexington, Massachusetts' William Dawes Elementary School. Miss Taylor (Danielle Carter) asks her students to draw a picture about what the world will look like in their imagination in fifty years, the pictures to be stored in a time capsule to be opened in 2009. One student, Lucinda Embry (Lara Robinson), a pale girl with a haunted look on her face fills her paper with seemingly random rows of numbers, much to the dismay of Miss Taylor. When the time capsule is opened fifty years later, Lucinda’s paper is given to young Caleb, whose father is Professor John Koestler (Nicolas Cage), a hard-drinking widower whose wife died in a hotel fire only a few years ago.

Shockingly, Professor Koestler discovers that the numbers on Lucinda’s paper are predictive of the dates, number of people killed, and the latitude and longitude of every major disaster occurring in the last fifty years, with a harbinger of similar events to come, the final one suggesting the possibility of massive global destruction. As a physics professor, Koestler believes in the randomness of the universe, that “stuff” happens, but the unfolding events that seem to involve his son cause him to question the role fate plays in our lives, especially when Caleb is approached by otherworldly creatures he calls “the whisperers” who communicate telepathically. Whether the creatures are aliens or angels is left to the viewer to decide, but their main function in the film seems to be mainly to scare the bejabbers out of the audience.

Koestler enlists the help of Diana Wayland (Rose Byrne), daughter of the girl who wrote the prophecies fifty years before, and her young daughter Abby (Lara Robinson) who also talks to the “whisperers” to attempt to prevent the predicted events from happening, but the most he can do is stand around, pick up bodies, or shout furiously. While more thoughtful than most disaster movies, Knowing has its share of explosions, chase sequences, and assorted vehicle accidents, including a state-of-the art plane crash in an open field near Logan Airport, and an off track subway train hurtling through a tunnel at breakneck speed, but, by the end, the film moves from over-the-top frenzy to a more subtler level that brings in apocalyptic and religious themes.

Proyas must be commended for tackling important questions, and he has produced a work of excitement, imagination, and some chills, even though it is marred by a one-dimensional performance from Cage, whose emotions range from worried concern to frantic hysteria. Credit should also be given to the studio for giving the green light to a project which will inevitably divide people because of its subject matter and because it dares to introduce an element of faith and hope into typical doomsday scenarios. Some critics have attempted to scare off viewers by waving the dreaded “New Age” flag but hopefully today’s viewers are more sophisticated. After all, this is a new age, whether or not some people have gotten the message, and any film that challenges us to explore ideas about life and its future on planet Earth, while providing music from Beethoven’s Seventh Symphony, has a lot to offer.

"Timewave Zero" is the theory postulated by author/philosopher Terence McKenna that calculates the rise and fall of novelty (dynamic change) in the universe. When McKenna graphed it over time, he found that it reached infinity on December, 21 2012, the end of the current Baktun cycle of the long-count calendar of the ancient Mayas. Since the concept was introduced in the 1970s by McKenna and Jose Arguellos, speculation has been rampant as to what the world might look like when it approaches its omega point, and there have been a plethora of books and films on the subject in recent years, the most anticipated being Roland Emmerich’s film 2012 due in October. A recent direct to DVD documentary, 2012: Science or Superstition, directed by Nimrod Erez, explores the meaning of the Mayan Calendar’s end date and what it might mean for the world, and does so with restraint and intelligence.

Talking heads discuss whether 2012 will bring a singular catastrophic event, a gradual transition to a higher level of consciousness, or nothing at all. The documentary features discussion by such unconventional thinkers as Graham Hancock, author of the major international bestsellers The Sign and The Seal, Fingerprints of the Gods, Supernatural, and Heaven's Mirror; John Major Jenkins, an independent researcher who has devoted himself to reconstructing ancient Mayan cosmology and philosophy; Daniel Pinchbeck, author and lecturer who in 1994 was chosen by The New York Times Magazine as one of "thirty under thirty" destined to change our culture; Alberto Villoldo, PhD, a medical anthropologist; and Anthony F. Aveni, the Russell B. Colgate Professor of Astronomy and Anthropology, considered one of the founders of Mesoamerican archaeoastronomy.

Other speakers include: Robert Bauval, Jim Marrs, Walter Cruttenden, Lawrence E. Joseph, Douglas Rushkoff, John Anthony West and Benito Vegas Duran. Unlike some History Channel documentaries, the speakers are given ample opportunity to develop their points of view and narration is kept to a minimum. As evidence for sudden change, they point to the melting of the polar ice caps, the weakening of the magnetic field and shifting of the poles, the drastic increase of solar flares, the increase in natural disasters, and the rare alignment of the Earth, Sun, and the center of the Milky Way on the December 2012 solstice. According to this belief, the alignment is tied to the precession of the equinoxes (approximately every 2160 years, the constellation visible on the early morning of the spring equinox changes) and signals a transition from one world age to another.

There are few voices of dissent, however, and no debate takes place about such questions as why the Mayans devised a calendar some time around 500 BC, with a back-dated ‘start date’ in 3114 BC, or what the true significance of a recurring 1,872,000 day cycle (approximately equal to 5125.36 years) as a whole might be. There are also no interviews with scholars of Mayan civilization or people such as Sandra Noble, executive director of the Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc. who has said, "For the ancient Maya, it was a huge celebration to make it to the end of a whole cycle. To render December 21, 2012, as a doomsday or moment of cosmic shifting is a complete fabrication and a chance for a lot of people to cash in." Also not discussed, is the fact that the galactic alignment in question takes place over a 36-year period, and the nucleus of the Milky Way could not have been identified without high-powered telescopes which the Mayans did not have.

2012: Science or Superstition thankfully does not include professional debunkers, scientific or otherwise, and the word “nonsense” is not even heard once during the film, yet, while I am supportive of the ideas discussed, a bit more controversy would have livened up the proceedings, including discussion of biblical prophecy, crop circles, UFOs, and the exponential growth in spirituality worldwide pointing to a paradigm shift. While thought provoking, 2012: Science or Superstition is a pretty bloodless affair, with dramatics mostly eliminated, yet it is a valuable source of information and adds to the growing interest in what many forecast will be the end of civilization and/or a new beginning. Those who want to be blown out of their seats, however, will have to wait for Roland Emmerich.


©2008 Howard Schumann
CineScene