Twists
and Turns
Video offerings from
Lovell Mahan-Moutaw
A
Couch with a View
I
should have known it from the start. As with The Sixth Sense
(there was no hope that Unbreakable would not be compared), M.
Night Shyamalan gave it all away in the first few minutes. If you were
paying attention, and had watched a few interviews with Shyamalan after
the breakthrough of The Sixth Sense, you could have figured it
out. With both of those things under my belt, I still didn't figure
it out until moments before.
It seems Shyamalan has a penchant for the twist. If done
well, as with The Sixth Sense (and perhaps better with David
Fincher's Fight Club), knowing the twist doesn't take away from
the film after repeat viewings. There are so many hints and clues throughout
the film that you could watch it again and again with enjoyment - even
reveling in your own stupidity that you didn't catch on.
Unbreakable
is the story of David and Elijah (Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson).
David has never been hurt, has never remembered being sick. Elijah has
spent his while life in sickness and pain with an odd condition that
renders his bones easily breakable. In order to bolster the flagging
spirits of her breakable son, known to his classmates as "Mr. Glass,"
Elijah's mother gets him involved with comic books. Elijah grows up
practically obsessed with them, making a study of the good and the evil
portrayed in them and making a fortune out of the artwork involved in
creating them.
David,
on the other hand, is a simple man whose one great act in life seems
to have been turning his back on a football career for the love of the
woman who would become his wife. He is a security guard at a college.
His marriage is in trouble. He is considering leaving Philadelphia and
moving to New York, away from his wife and child. When we are introduced
to Elijah, we feel he is strong-willed and smart. When we are introduced
to David we feel he is weak and perhaps even a bit of a low-life.
Bruce
Willis plays David as if he were Clint Eastwood playing David. He talks
in a strangely ineffective whisper and attempts to look downtrodden.
He cannot quite pull it off and was miscast, I'm assuming, out of Shyamalan's
loyalty. Samuel L. Jackson, on the other hand, gives Elijah personality
with his big eyes, wild hair, commanding voice and bizarre clothes.
I
liked Unreakable. I liked it a lot, more than I expected I would.
I must say that it was slow in parts, even painfully slow. But it made
up for this in the final thirty minutes. Shyamalan has a talent for
the spooky, the quick and effective scare. He imbues his work with atmosphere.
Everything means something - the colors, the costumes - he does not
rely simply on the story and the acting but pays attention to every
little detail. I admire that greatly. He used a trick that he used in
The Sixth Sense and if you knew what it was you should
have figured it out. I knew what it was and I still didn't figure it
out, because Shyamalan added some new components. I have yet to figure
those out.
Shyamalan
has a talent also for coaxing heartbreaking performances out of children.
Spencer Treat Clark (also seen in Gladiator as Lucius) portrays
Willis' son, and does so beautifully. I love the way Shyamalan endeavors
to put some real feeling between the characters in a family. The husband
and wife in The Sixth Sense were great but the real beauty lay
in the relationship between the mother and the son. The same can be
said for Unbreakable's fragile family of Clark, Willis and an
almost unidentifiable Robin Wright Penn as Willis's wife.
As
for the twist, well, it certainly wasn't the shock I received during
the twist of The Sixth Sense. Maybe that's because I figured
it out moments before. I should have, of course, known earlier. It was
nevertheless cool. It was cool in that geeky comic book sort of way.
It was cool in that way that you look at the geeky comic book guys and
wonder why they are such geeks and then realize how bright they are,
how interesting they are and how totally awesome the artwork is on their
walls. It is cool in that way that seems anti-cool but is really cool
because what you think is cool is actually conformity and what
is really cool is something else.
I know practically nothing at all about the life of Oscar Wilde, or
at least I didn't. I knew he was a writer and I knew he was a wit. His
story is a terrible tragedy. He married a woman he "loved," yet after
a couple of kids with the wife, he was introduced to who he really was
(a homosexual) by his wife's cousin.
Shortly
thereafter, he met Lord Alfred Douglas, better known as Bosie, and fell
head over heels in love with him. Bosie was a selfish, horrible young
man. In his way he loved Wilde, but his way is the kind you want to
run from like you're being chased by a rabid rottweiler. Bosie's father,
who mistreated him, his brother and mother, decided to take on Wilde
- and Wilde, ill-advisedly, took on Bosie's father. Wilde ended up doing
two years of hard labor for being homosexual.
Wilde
is the kind of movie that shows us perhaps how far we've come. Yet it
feels somewhat like a mirror or guide to how far we still need to go.
The thought of someone doing two years of hard labor in prison for his
sexual preference makes me ill. The fact that this is a true story makes
me sad. It is doubtful that this could happen today - at least in the
West. But things like this happen all the time in little ways - perhaps
not so public, but just as horrible.
Wilde is played by Stephen Fry, who is very, very tall. Bosie is played
by Jude Law, who is very, very good at being gay. Wilde plays
like most British period pieces, gorgeous scenery and wonderful costumes
and
only
just a little slow at parts, but there is always something to look at.
There is a glorious voiceover of one of Wilde's fairy tales - the story
of a giant who seems to have represented Wilde's view of himself. I
loved it when Fry would say something witty...he was hilarious. This
movie was quite good, definitely worth a view.
I love Christopher Guest. I love his Nigel Tufnel in This is Spinal
Tap. I love his Corky St. Clair in Waiting for Guffman. And
now, I love his Harlan Pepper in Best in Show.
Best in Show is another brilliant mockumentary
by Guest (or is that Sir Christopher?) the King and Creator of mockumentaries.
In This is Spinal Tap, Guest (and Michael McKean, Rob Reiner
and Harry Shearer) took on heavy metal rock bands. In Waiting for
Guffman, Guest (with Eugene Levy) took on regional theater. In Best
in Show, Guest (again with Levy) takes on dog shows.
Best in Show is high comedy with great writing
and an ensemble cast that consistently blows you away. Regulars like
Catherine O'Hara, Michael McKean, Fred Willard and Parker Posey don't
act funny, they are funny - beyond funny. It isn't what they
say, it is what they do, what they wear, their facial expressions and
their reactions. It is the whole comic package and it is hilarious to
behold.
Take
Parker Posey and Michael Hitchcock's Meg and Hamilton Swan. They open
the film completely distraught that their weimerauner is upset at seeing
them have sex. They are speaking to a doggie psychologist (or is it
a marriage counselor?). They both wear braces and have expensive haircuts.
As the movie forges on, we realize they are high strung and neurotic
(or is the weimerauner?). Their brilliant interview about how they met
("At Starbuck's - not the same Starbuck's. Starbuck's across the street
from each other.") and what they have in common (their comments about
catalogues are priceless) is alone worth the price of the rental.
But
there is more. Cookie and Gerry Fleck (Catherine O'Hara and Eugene Levy),
she of the "hundreds of old boyfriends" he of the two left feet, literally;
Scott Donlan and Stephen Vanderhoof (John Michael Higgins and Michael
McKean) the screamingly gay owners of the shi zu; and Sheri Ann and
Christy (Jennifer Coolidge and Jane Lynch) the gold digging wife and
her "handler" who turn out to be lesbionic. Every couple is somewhat
frighteningly like their dog, but we never know if it is the dog that
makes the couple or the couple that makes the dog. Harlan Pepper (Guest)
is the only solo flier in this crazy outfit and he thinks his hound
dog can talk...not really, but still.
I
mention as much of the cast as possible because they deserve mention.
The actors behave so naturally that you almost forget that they're acting.
Guest's Harlan Pepper is the best - how he can do Tufnel's British rock
star, St. Clair's flaming gay regional theater director, and then pull
off Pepper's good ole boy is beyond me. The man is a master, not just
a talented comedic writer but perhaps one of the most talented comedic
actors I've ever seen. Levy is good and so is O'Hara, and McKean seems
to so enjoy his characters you can't help but have fun with him.
I
can't forget to mention Fred Willard, who plays Buck Laughlin, the dog
show commentator who has no earthly idea what he's talking about and
is highly inappropriate at the best of times. I can't say what my favorite
part of the movie is - perhaps it's Sheri Ann talking about how she
and her 100 year old husband (he looks it) can always find something
"not to talk about." Or when Cookie's ex-lover's (who happens to be
a hostage negotiator) son climbs up on the roof of the shed and he tries
to talk him down by insulting him. Or when Scott and Stephen discuss
packing and how many kimonos Scott needs to take (he takes seven and
they are gone for two days). The movie is just plain worth the money.
Watch it closely because there is much more going on than you might
think.
©2001 Lovell Mahan-Moutaw
CineScene