Click here for a list of CineScene reviews listed by
MOVIE TITLE

Click here for a list of CineScene reviews listed by
AUTHOR

Other Mahan-Moutaw reviews


Contact Us

 

Really, what about Bob?
by Lovell Mahan-Moutaw

A Couch with a View

Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (George Roy Hill, 1969) is a mishmash of good, bad and brilliant, a great example of talented people willing to take chances. The story is based on fact: Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid were real train robbers who went out in a blaze of glory facing the Bolivian cavalry. (Or did they? Butch's sister claimed that he came back home and lived under an assumed name until a ripe old age.) According to anyone and everyone, Butch was an affable fellow, a man on the wrong side of the law who got along with everyone. The Sundance Kid was yin to Butch's yang (or yang to Butch's yin or whatever). A thug, mean to the bone, unstable, violent, and a drunk who had no friends, save Butch.

Paul Newman plays Butch, making him both likable and comedic. Robert Redford plays Sundance, making him less of a thug and more of a good-lookin' quick draw artist who doesn't have a lot of patience with social pleasantries. The movie has its good points: Newman and Redford - both good, sometimes great, but never bad (well, Redford deliveres a few lines woodenly).

The movie also has its bad points: A Burt Bacharach score that was specifically made to sound contemporary, and to go with some of the contemporary feel of the movie and dialogue, even though it's supposed to be a period piece. It sounds dated now, but they took a chance with it, and there are times when it works - there are also times when it is sadly laughable. There is a chase scene that is overlong. WAY overlong. The first "musical interlude" is corny.

The second and third "musical interludes" are well done. The New York City sequence is wonderful. Edith Head's costumes are fantastic. The shootout in the Bolivian marketplace is great, and the final Butch and Sundance conversation is well-written, well-acted, hopeful, horrible, funny, sad, delightful and tragic. The end is inspired.

The video includes a 45-minute documentary on the making of the film, narrated by Hill with commentary by Newman, Redford, and screenwriter William Goldman. It seems Hill didn't get along with any of his actors (particularly Katharine Ross). The New York stills were shot on the set created for Hello Dolly. The massacre (where they killed the banditos) was filmed twice. Hill's first version seemed too balletic (they showed this version and it was very graceful). In the end, Hill went with the slo-mo dying style. The final shot (the still of Butch and Sundance turning sepia) was done after flying in an FX wiz from the studio. One of the stunt men who was "shot" during the final shootout was Newman's double, and he broke his pelvis when he fell from the building.

Outside of being a little bored during the chase sequence, I loved this movie. It was interesting to watch on a variety of levels - the story, the "backstory," and the great chemistry between Newman and Redford.

The Sting (George Roy Hill, 1973). Redford and Newman team up again with Hill for this Academy Award winning, movie-long lesson on how to run a con. Although Hill doesn't seem to have the same artistic chops that made Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid such a delight, Redford and Newman (with a fine supporting cast of character actors including Ray Walston, Harold Gould, Eileen Brennan and Charles Durning) save this movie and make it a winner. A damn good script (David S. Ward) doesn't hurt either.

Newman play a veteran con man who takes Redford under his wing. Together they stage an elaborate "sting" on a mean, crooked banker played by Robert Shaw. If you can manage to avoid obsessing on the obvious sets and studio backlots, and the sometimes ill-advised camera maneuvers, and pay attention to the acting and writing, then you won't be disappointed. It's interesting and smart. I'll give Hill credit for the period-specific stills and adapting Scott Joplin's rag for the movie - perfect touches.

Bob, though, I have to say, is not so good sometimes. He can (as he did in The Great Gatsby and Butch Cassidy) seem a bit wooden. I have to say that Robert Shaw is (not counting the accent, which seemed to slip at times) very, very good. A fun film, with a nice sucker punch at the end.

The Way We Were (Sydney Pollack, 1973). I would call this The Way I Wish We Weren't And Never Would Be. It's about a Jewish left-wing student (Barbra Streisand) who has an unlikely romance with an apolitical Gentile jock dreamboat (Robert Redford). Although Barbra is luminous and Bob is unbelievably, otherworldly handsome and both (yes, even Bob, through and through) give powerful performances, this story seems, well, no, it is real...and sometimes it's really hard to watch. If I were Hubbell (Redford), I would have cut Katie (Streisand) loose way before he did and never gone back to her.

But then, the point of this movie is how real the relationship seems. For example, we do stupid things when we love someone - like, say, stay with them way longer than we ever should. Katie's call to Hubbell after he dumps her is agonizing to watch. I've made those calls before and made those promises (both verbally and in my head). "I'll change and be whatever you want me to be." But you can't change, you always must and will be yourself, and thus will never be what the other person wants - and why do you want someone who does not want you and all the little and big parts of you? Big question, sad answer.

Oh! And the fight they have on the street - how many times do you find yourself in an embarrassing exchange in front of others? The movie was good, but hard to watch, a painful, real romance - as real as it gets, in my opinion, when the romance isn't right. The moments of exhuberance and love and lightheartedness fading to despair, and ultimately that numbing despondency when you know it is the end.

"Best year?"
"1944, 1945...1946."

Oh my.


©2002 Lovell Mahan-Moutaw
CineScene