| NOT
SO FAB
by Dan Schneider
I have never been a huge Beatles fan. I acknowledge them
as a fine pop quartet, but I have never swooned over them as the greatest
rock band of all time, despite sales records, because they were pop, not
rock. Rock was The Who, Led Zeppelin, or The Rolling Stones.
But even were one to accept them as the greatest pop group of all
time, their film work has to be considered distinct. Prior to watching
their second live action film, Richard Lester's Help!,
I had seen, as a child, the psychedelic cartoon Yellow Submarine
(which I recall as mildly diverting), and their first live action film,
the black and white A Hard Day’s Night (also directed by
Lester), which, while nowhere near great cinema, was somewhat better than
this film, because a) it had a real (if thin) plot, b) featured better
acting by the supporting cast and even the boys, and c) actually had some
real humor.
Help! (1965)
by contrast, is simply a bad film. One might argue that, a full generation
before MTV, it is a great extended music video, with nonsensical non-musical
interludes, and thus a seminal work in that genre. On those terms I will
concur, but cinematically, while there are many stylistic innovations
employed, from the use of color tinting to choppy and quick edits, etc.,
it simply has no tale to tell save this: an Indian cult obsesses over
a large red ring that a female fan sends Ringo Starr as a gift. The cult
travels to India to a) either get the ring, or b) sacrifice Ringo if the
ring cannot be removed from his finger. Granted, a mad scientist and his
assistant, as well as an Inspector and his crew from Scotland Yard, join
in the chase. But that’s it. The film ends with the ring coming
off Ringo’s finger, the boys escaping, and the rest of the cast
chasing each other.
The Beatles films are often claimed as descendants of movies featuring
Marx Brothers. But, love them or hate them, the Marx Brothers were simply
better actors than the boys. What Beatle had the verbal panache and physical
dexterity of Groucho, or could equal the nonpareil silent gags of Harpo?
In fact, not only are The Beatles sub-Marx Brothers-level, but they make
The Three Stooges look like comic geniuses. The Beatles’ films are
simply anomic, with no real direction. Even in the loosest films from
the Marx Brothers there is a direction and thin thread that ties the gags
and musical numbers together.
In
addition (and this would likely be deemed heresy by Fab Four enthusiasts)
the Fab Four were far inferior actors and comedians to the Prefab Four.
Yes, that’s right. The group of television actors that were assembled
to portray a pop group, The Monkees, were far better actors and comedians
than The Beatles. Of course they were not better musicians, although they
were often given some very good pop songs to record. But they were
actors first and musicians second. Davy Jones, for instance, the lone
Brit in the Monkees and thought of as "the cute one," displayed
a range of quips and reactions of sardonicism, disbelief, fear, and humor
in the series episodes. Paul McCartney, by contrast, is just a piece of
wood.
On
the plus side, Help! serves as a bit of pop trivia potpourri,
if for no other fact than that two of the main character actors in the
film (Patrick Cargill as the Inspector and Leo McKern as Swami Clang)
would later go on to portray the leaders of The Village, No. 2, in the
existential and classic British television series The Prisoner.
Also, the use of text across the screen (although their day-glo-like colors
often wash out against the film’s background), faux intermissions,
and the use of quick edits to reflect the directions of the text, as well
as convey the impressions of memory, were innovative. The music, of course,
was first rate, and the non sequitur end credit for "Elias Howe,
who, in 1846, invented the sewing machine," shows how well the film
may have gone with even a bit more intellectual pursuit in the screenplay.
While a number of The Beatles tunes play on the radio, record players,
or in the background, there are only seven "official" soundtrack
tunes for which the boys appear in de facto videos.
The two-disc DVD,
put out by Apple, the Beatles' label, is a good solid release. Disc One
has the 90-minute long film with a fantastic transfer and restoration
job, but unfortunately no commentary track. While it would have been a
coup to score McCartney or Starr, the two living Beatles, surely a film
or music historian (or both) could have been pressed into duty? The look,
as stated, is superb: the film looks like it was shot last month, not
44 years ago. Disc Two has the extras, and they are solid. There is a
section called "A Missing Scene." Alas, it is just Lester speaking
about the scene-- not the scene itself. There’s a featurette about
the restoration process used on the film. Another featurette presents
cast and crew memories of the film. There are three theatrical film trailers,
and a radio spot, along with a half hour long featurette on The Beatles
in Help!. But like the film itself, the DVD package could have been
so much more.
Was
Help! a film that had influence on the future musical scene?
Of course, for it marked the beginning of the music video concept, and
in retrospect, it has been far more influential, both musically and in
terms of marketing (it’s essentially one long advertisement), than
its predecessor, A Hard Day’s Night. But, it’s simply
not as good a film as their first one, which itself was only mildly entertaining,
filmically. As a comedy, Help! is just not funny. Compared to
films from great comedy teams, the laughs are sparse, and the skits lame
blackouts, unable to sustain laughter upon rewatch, assuming one even
laughs the first time. So beware, if you are anything but a diehard Beatles.
Help! really needs it.
©2009 Dan Schneider
CineScene
|