Before
Broadway:
A Look At Mel Brooks' The Producers
by
Catherine Lucy
Mel Brooks' first feature length directorial effort was The Producers
(1968). Brooks went all out on his first film--not only did he direct
it, but he also wrote the screenplay and composed the music. The only
thing missing from the film is Brooks himself, although his voice has
an uncredited role. The Producers is a worthy comedic effort
that hints at Brooks' genius to follow, but the screenplay is ultimately
the best thing about this film.
Zero Mostel stars as Max Bialystock, a washed-up Broadway producer
who courts elderly, rich women, and then suckers them into giving him
money to produce non-existent plays. When a new accountant named Leo
Blooom (Gene Wilder) shows up to work on Bialystock's books, he innocently
notes that a producer could actually make more money, under certain
conditions, if he produced a flop instead of a hit. Bialystock is intrigued
by the idea of becoming an instant millionaire, and the two, now co-producers,
seek out the worst script, director, and actors they can find to guarantee
a flop. The result is "Springtime for Hitler."
The
play's author (Kenneth Mars) is a Nazi sympathizer who wants everyone
to know how wonderful Hitler was. Bialystock then chooses a flamboyant
director who throws in a few musical numbers, and a doped-up hippie
actor (Dick Shawn) to star in the play. Backed by a million dollars
worth of silver-haired investors, the producers are guaranteed to retire
as millionaires when the play flops and closes, at little cost to them.
But of course, things don't go as planned.
The screenplay is tight and well-paced. Other than a few brief and
embarassing scenes (by today's standards) with the incompetent but sexy
secretary Bialystock hires, every scene has a purpose and sticks to
it. The picture doesn't wander or try to incorporate more into the story
than there really is. And Brooks doesn't rely on parody to produce comedic
results as he does in his later films. In The Producers, the
humor lies within the story's concept. This is not a great comedy, although
Mars and Shawn's performances bring laughs, and Mostel is brilliant.
The one real negative aspect is the opening credits sequence, which
is terribly is dated both because of its music and the quirky editing
that plague so many movies from the 1960s. However, the film's concept
is timeless and could easily be made today. In fact, Brooks recently
turned it into a Broadway musical, which promptly won a slew of Tonys.
End note: The more I watch Brooks' films the more I notice the influence
of Charlie Chaplin. There are some very obvious similarities, such as:
two Jewish guys who direct, write, star in, compose music, and even
sing (!) in their own films. They both made fun of Hitler (Brooks in
The Producers and To Be or Not to Be; Chaplin in The
Great Dictator). They both co-starred with their wives. Brooks even
made his own silent movie titled Silent Movie. Brooks also tries
to bring an element of humanism to his characters, as Chaplin did. His
people may be uneducated, tramps, or lacking in some other favorable
quality, but they are still humans who evoke our sympathy and compassion.
©2001 Catherine Lucy
CineScene